Unraveling the Myth of “Too Big to Rig”: How Trump’s Election Claims Are Like Betting Against the House

The idea that an election can be “too big to rig” is a flawed concept that fails to acknowledge the realities of how elections work. In most cases, the reason a candidate or party loses an election is not due to some intricate system of fraud or cheating, but simply because they did not receive enough votes.

In the case of Donald Trump and the 2020 election, his loss was not the result of a rigged system, but rather a lack of voter support. Despite his claims of widespread fraud and election rigging, these allegations have been repeatedly debunked and dismissed by courts and election officials.

The notion that simply voting more will overcome a rigged system is a dangerous one, as it implies that the outcome of an election can be predetermined and manipulated. In reality, elections are a reflection of the will of the people, and the idea that an election can be “too big to rig” undermines the democratic process.

Instead of focusing on unfounded claims of election fraud, it is important for candidates and parties to engage with voters and earn their support through policy proposals and campaign efforts. By respecting the integrity of the election process and working to build trust with voters, we can ensure that elections remain free and fair.